These Things Have Come To My Attention

Monitoring StationIf you live in Lan­caster, PA, some­one is record­ing you when you go to your doctor’s office.  Your lawyer’s.  There are tapes of your com­ings and goings at Planned Par­ent­hood.  At the gay bar.  At the adult book­store.   It’s not the police.  It’s not the FBI.  It’s a pri­vate group with no account­abil­ity, no over­sight, and no trans­parency.   The tapes belong to them, and the only way to get them is through a sub­poena.  And the per­son watch­ing the screen could be your stalker, your ex, or a preda­tor learn­ing your patterns.

Lan­caster, the town where I live, work, and make art, is rapidly becom­ing the most-watched city in Amer­ica.  This is dis­turb­ing enough, but the worst part is who’s doing the watch­ing.  It’s not the police, it’s not the city’s red-shirt secu­rity force.  It’s a pri­vate orga­ni­za­tion with no appar­ent gov­ern­men­tal over­sight.  Soon, there will be 165 cam­eras around my city, or about 40 cam­eras per square mile.  Accord­ing to the LA Times, that’s more cam­eras than Boston or San Francisco.

Here’s the LA Times arti­cle that’s bring­ing it to everyone’s atten­tion.  Please read this first.

Here’s the web­site of the Lan­caster Com­mu­nity Safety Coali­tion, the group respon­si­ble (although account­able to no one)

Some quick points:

  1. A pri­vate orga­ni­za­tion spy­ing on an entire city with­out ANY pub­lic account­abil­ity or trans­parency should be ter­ri­fy­ing to you.  Imag­ine if your neigh­bor video­taped your front door 24/7.  Now imag­ine that your neigh­bor refuses to hand the tapes over to you.  Now imag­ine your neigh­bor refuses to even show you what’s on the tapes.  Now imag­ine that your neigh­bor refuses to tell you what he/she is doing with the tapes, or what they’ve done with them.  Now imag­ine that it’s not your neigh­bor who’s doing this– it’s a per­son who you’ve never met, whose face you’ve never seen, and whose name you don’t know.  Now imag­ine you tell the cops and they say there’s noth­ing they can do.
  2. I have con­tacted the LCSC for a list of the cam­eras (installed and planned) loca­tions.  I have not yet received a reply.
  3. Steven Ressler sits on the board of direc­tors for the LCSC, and he is Man­ager of Pur­chas­ing and Qual­ity at Bosch Secu­rity.  Bosch Secu­rity sold the cam­eras and infra­struc­ture to the LCSC.  The LCSC claims in a press release that the cam­eras were sold (at a dis­count) for $2000 each.  While I couldn’t find the exact model of the cam­era used, it appears to be sim­i­lar to Bosch’s Envi­roDome series, which is adver­tised here for $2333 as of this writing.
  4. A study in San Fran­cisco found that their CCTV cam­eras did not deter vio­lent crime, only relo­cate it.  It seems that the cam­eras did not pre­vent any­one from killing any­one else, it just made them re-think where to com­mit their mur­der and/or rape.
  5. The evi­dence is anec­do­tal, but I have seen no proof that the cam­eras help pre­vent or solve prop­erty crime in Lan­caster.  At my pre­vi­ous address, my room­mate had his car van­dal­ized and robbed, and his bike stolen (on seper­ate occa­sions).  The CCTV cam­era in place not 15m away clearly did not deter the per­pe­tra­tors (despite the “CCTV Cam­eras in Use” sign directly above his car at the time), and the crimes remain unsolved.

Even if it can be proven that sur­veil­lance pre­vents crime, I would still be against this.  This is an orga­ni­za­tion that is made up of unelected offi­cials, none of whom report to an elected offi­cial.  As of this writ­ing, LCSC does not pub­lish its ros­ter of watch­peo­ple, or records of who/what/where they are watch­ing.   As it stands, you have no way of know­ing if you are being exces­sively watched, and even if you did, you would have no one to file a griev­ance with.  If you feel you are unjustly han­dled by the police, you have access to publicly-funded orga­ni­za­tions to help you, and access to all police records to help you make your case. There are no such pro­tec­tions from the all-seeing eye of the LCSC.

Please stick with me as I fol­low this story and see what we can do to dis­man­tle this.

[image cour­tesy LA Times]

  • Moleman
    such bullshit, I can't believe this is actually happening. Glad we could all have a say in this too!
  • Eva Mazharenko
    Please, let us know if there is a way of organizing ourselves against this and challenging the coalition as well as the city - in a civil as well as a legal way. This is beyond understanding and continues to testify to the paralyzing level of paranoia and loss of common sense among the local people.
  • Sherry Wolfe
    Here is the way to challenge the LCSC surveillance cameras in Lancaster, Pa. The Lancaster Coalition for Peace & Justice has formed a working group to combat the video proliferation. We held a protest rally,then a well attended Town Hall Meeting on July 12 and will hold another on July 26.Articles have appeared in the local New Era and Intellingencer Journal;Citizens in Lancaster are mobilizing and this issue is gaining rapid momentum. We need your help to stop this invasion of privacy. Please contact Sherry Wolfe apr585@aol.com for more info.
  • Sherry Wolfe
    Visit www.lancasterpeace.org for info on what we are doing to halt proliferation of video surveillance cameras in Lancaster, Pa. Click on the article for entire story and photos of recent anti -camera protest rally.There is also a link to subscribe to our listserve for important updates and announcements.
blog comments powered by Disqus